04.01.03

Site Admin

Welcome to PNAC.Info


Welcome to PNAC.Info - an effort to investigate, analyze, and expose the Project for the New American Century*, and its plan for a “unipolar” world.

We are compiling information and analysis geared toward exposing the big-picture plan behind the current war in Iraq, and other foreign policy decisions of the current administration.

If you have any comments, links, or ideas, please feel free to post a comment below this message here.

Thank you for your visit.

Be well, be free,

Lance M. Brown

*often referred to as the “Project for a New American Century”

9 Feedbacks on "Welcome to PNAC.Info"

Ed's Weblog

Raising awareness of PNAC

The other day I wrote to Robin Cook MP on the subject of PNAC and the war in Iraq, basically



The Gamer's Nook

A new site to track the PNAC

PNAC.info - Exposing the Project for the New American Century I’ve already added this to my Pundits blogroll. Good to



Steve Runge

Your homepage ought to have some kind of capsule statement of what PNAC represents, its close ties to defense contractors, who are its principal members, and what this means for democracy and global security.

I’d send this site to quite a few friends, but your homepage layout isn’t, to say the least, inviting to a neophyte. You need a short statement of what I mentioned above, so people won’t just surf away elsewhere without knowing just how bad PNAC is.



J. Lawrence Seymour

Lance: Are you a one man show or are there others in this project? I am all for it, but give me alist of your members. The web site links look inviting.



Ed Herbert

Have you read Norman Mailer’s new paperback “Why Are We at War” just published ? If you (rhetorically speaking) love true freedoms, and believe in the potential for greatness in this country that is now being trashed in exchange for empire and the hegemony of the mega-corporate-oligarchies, and you don’t want to see it stolen away slowly and surely from the last desperate grasp of average citizens, make sure you read this book and consider what we are all up against with PNAC and their sponsors. Then look at your children, and at that reflection in your mirror and take the measure of your stomach for the test that is coming for us all. The “flag waving” ultra right have thrown down the gauntlet to the world and all Americans. “Which side are you on” is not an irrelevant question anymore…



Anon

I agree with the comments by Steve Runge. The layout of your site is not user-friendly to someone unfamiliar with PNAC. I would also strongly suggest an Introductory page with a statement explaining what PNAC stands for, its political significance, and why it is dangerous.

Perhaps using easily understood analogies–such as comparing the PNAC to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, or explaining that the PNAC is essentially a blueprint for global American Empire, or saying that the PNAC envisions an “American World Order”–would be helpful.

Finally, you might want to *highlight* for special emphasis the following three articles about PNAC which summarize in easy-to-understand language what PNAC is all about.

-John Pilger’s “America’s Bid For Global Dominance”
http://pilger.carlton.com/print/124759
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=49&ItemID=2744

-Neil McKay’s “Bush planned Iraq ‘regime change’ before becoming President” from the Sunday Herald

-Jay Bookman’s “The president’s real goal in Iraq”
from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution



Anonymous

makes me want to cry



glenn mcguire

I have found your site to be very informative and I am enclosing a link to a site which has recently posted Bill Moyers speech at the Take Back America Conference http://www.ourfuture.org/docUploads/Moyers.2.pdf
With your site, Lance, you are doing what Moyers has asked all Americans to do—Wake Up– and see the destruction of our country and our ideals at the hands corporate America.



Eddie Greenhill

I would be grateful if some of yoos
people who have started this website
could visit the BBC messageboard
“Great Debate - World Views”.
I have been shouting about “The Project”
on there for months and all I get from
the Americans who post, is that I am
anti-american/semitic or crazy
conspiricy theorist.
Americans talking about Kristol & Co
could really help me.
This is a great site!
Stop the Project! Good luck!



Comments

Please Leave a Comment!




Please not: Comments may be moderated. It may take a while for them to show on the page.





Welcome
Welcome to PNAC.info-- a site dedicated to drawing attention to the neoconservative foreign policy approach, and its consequences for America and the world.
Useful Links
Category: Outside Analysis
  • "Afghanistan: The War Without End" (within a war without end)
  • "Regime Change" Ambitions in Iran
  • "The Believer": In-depth look at Paul Wolfowitz "defending his war"
  • 1958-1991, Iraq: A Classic Case of Divide and Conquer
  • A Debate Over U.S. 'Empire' Builds in Unexpected Circles
  • An Economist's Case Against an Interventionist Foreign Policy
  • An Iran Trap?
  • Analysis: Wolfowitz's 1992 vision as 2002 U.S. Foreign Policy Reality
  • Article: Conservatives and exiles [begin to consider that they may have to think about having to] desert war campaign
  • Briefing - The rise of the Washington "neo-cons"
  • Empire Builders: Neoconservatives and their blueprint for US power
  • Getting Out of Iraq: Our Strategic Interest
  • Iraq war to gain US foothold in South Eastern Asia (college paper)
  • Is Iraq the opening salvo in a war to remake the world?
  • Is the Neoconservative Moment Over?
  • Jim Lobe's Neo-Con Focus Area from IPS
  • Neoconservatism Made Kristol Clear
  • Op-Ed: From Republic to Empire
  • Pay no attention to the neocon behind the curtain
  • Pentagon Office Home to Neo-Con Network
  • PNAC College Paper
  • PNAC on NPR's "Fresh Air"
  • Puppet Show: Will Ahmed Chalabi Govern Post-War Iraq?
  • Reference Materials for "Debating Empire"
  • Rep. Ron Paul's Speech to Congress: "Neo-conned"
  • Richard Perle's connections
  • The American Conservative: The Weekly Standard’s War
  • The Bush Foreign Policy Team's Shared Vision
  • The Conservative Split I: An Introduction to Neoconservatism
  • The Conservative Split III: A Call to Action
  • The Hawks Loudly Express Their Second Thoughts
  • The Neo-Conservative Ascendancy in the Bush Administration
  • The New Al Qaeda: More Dangerous than the Old Version
  • This war is brought to you by...
  • William Arkin connects the "Syria's next" dots
  • Category: News Articles
  • "Afghanistan: The War Without End" (within a war without end)
  • "The Believer": In-depth look at Paul Wolfowitz "defending his war"
  • $60 billion Rebuild Iraq Plan 'freezes out' UN, favors U.S.
  • 1992 "Defense Planning Guidance" Draft Excerpts
  • 4 years before 9/11, plan was set
  • A Debate Over U.S. 'Empire' Builds in Unexpected Circles
  • A think tank war: Why old Europe says no
  • ABC News: The Plan
  • Analysis: Wolfowitz's 1992 vision as 2002 U.S. Foreign Policy Reality
  • Angry Assad Says Syria Will Cooperate (but will fight if necessary)
  • Article: Conservatives and exiles [begin to consider that they may have to think about having to] desert war campaign
  • Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
  • CBS News: Plans For Iraq Attack Began On 9/11
  • China: Little Progress on N. Korea Talks/ N.Korea Offers Reactor-for-Concessions Bid
  • Debating Empire Prior to 9/11
  • Defense deputy gets authority for military tribunals
  • Disturbing Level of Unrest in Iraq
  • Familiar Hawks Take Aim at Syria
  • From Heroes To Targets
  • Hans Blix: Iraq war planned long in advance; banned arms not the priority
  • Hints of PNAC on CNN: "World War IV"?
  • Iran ♥'s Syria
  • Iran Raises Stakes on U.N. Inspections
  • Major survey shows non-interventionism rising in U.S.
  • Much Ado About Syria, Pt.1-- Clashes at the Border
  • Much Ado About Syria, Pt.2-- U.S. Weighed Military Strikes; Syria Gets Surly
  • Much Ado About Syria, Pt.4-- Syria: U.S. troops killed Syrian soldier
  • North Korea and the US 'on a slide towards conflict'
  • Op-Ed: The Pentagon's (CIA) Man in Iraq
  • Opposition groups reject US military rule plan
  • PNAC Proponents Inflated WMD Threat to Promote Iraq War
  • Rebuilding of Iraq is in Chaos, Say British
  • Richard Perle Resigns From Advisory Panel
  • Rumsfeld urged Clinton to attack Iraq
  • State Dept. Report: Democracy Domino Theory 'Not Credible'
  • Superb Article -- The Mideast: Neocons on the Line
  • Syria balks at U.N. Resolution, but promises cooperation
  • The Fight Yet to Come
  • The president's real goal in Iraq
  • The Thirty-Year Itch
  • The trouble with Delivering Democracy Abroad
  • This war is brought to you by...
  • U.N. Demands Syria's Cooperation
  • U.N. Resolution on Syria and Hariri assassination investigation
  • U.S. and partners scrap North Korea Reactor Project
  • U.S. pullback in S. Korea also alarming to N. Korea
  • US begins the process of 'regime change' in Iraq
  • US General Condemns Iraq Failures
  • US losing the peace in Afghanistan
  • Viewing the War as a Lesson to the World